Before Bumrah, four men taught India to be a fast-bowling country.

I. The meme takes the Honors Board

July 2014. Lord’s. Day 5.

India needed seven England wickets. England needed 264, with seven wickets in hand, on a flat fifth-day pitch.

Ishant Sharma had been a Test cricketer for seven years and a meme for at least four. Seventy Tests into his career, he averaged 37 with the ball. He had been dropped. Recalled. Dropped again. He had recovered from ankle surgery. The 2008 spell at Perth, Ricky Ponting hopping and missing, was six years old. The kind of footage older fans showed younger ones to argue for a player who had stopped justifying the argument.

Zaheer Khan had played his last Test five months earlier, in Wellington. He didn’t know it yet. India didn’t either. The lineage of Indian fast-bowling spearheads, Kapil, Srinath, Zaheer, had reached its end without naming a successor.

Then Dhoni told Ishant to bowl short. “To start with it was very difficult to convince him,” Dhoni later told The Guardian. “So I set a field to him so he couldn’t even think of pitching it up. That was the start.”

What followed was the spell that bent the curve.

After lunch on Day 5, Dhoni told Ishant to take rest after four overs on the trot. Ishant turned to him. “There is fuel in the car. Let it run.”

Twenty-three overs. Seven wickets for 74. Bell. Cook. Moeen. Prior. Stokes. Root. Broad. India won by 95 runs. It was their first Test win at Lord’s in twenty-eight years.

Ishant’s 7/74 became the best fourth-innings figures by an Indian seamer in Test history. The previous best, Javagal Srinath’s 6/21 from 1996, had stood for eighteen years. The Lord’s bowling Honors Board, which had no Indian seamer on it before that Sunday, now had two names. Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s 6/82 from the first innings. Ishant’s 7/74 from the fourth. For the first time in the history of Indian cricket, two seamers had taken six or more wickets in the same Test.

The meme had taken the Honors Board.

Seventy Tests into his career, Ishant averaged 37. He would average 23.4 over his next thirty-five.

Lord’s was not really about Ishant. It was about what Lord’s meant. Four men who would teach India to be a fast-bowling country had just played their first signature Test as a generation. Three of them were in the XI that day. The fourth was at home, recovering, waiting. None of them yet knew what they were going to be. Most of India didn’t either.

This is the story of how they became it. Before Bumrah ever bowled a Test ball.

II. The lineage

Indian fast bowling is the story of a country that took thirty-five years to learn how to bowl in a pack. Kapil first, alone. Srinath next, with a partner. Zaheer after, with a crew. Each generation inherited something the one before it had built. None of them, until the last, inherited a unit.

Kapil Dev debuted in 1978 and stayed for sixteen years. He retired with 434 Test wickets, a world record at the time. But Kapil topped out in the high 130s. His support cast in 1983, Madan Lal, Roger Binny, Chetan Sharma, were medium-pacers who could swing the new ball. India won a World Cup with this attack. But Kapil was the only seam threat. When he retired in 1994, the cupboard was bare.

Javagal Srinath was the first genuinely fast Indian bowler. Between 1995 and 1997, the Mysore Express was clocked at 156 km/h in South Africa. He was comparable to Allan Donald on his best days. In Ahmedabad in November 1996, he took 6/21 in the fourth innings against South Africa. The old ball reversing both ways. Tendulkar called it “one of the greatest exhibitions of fast bowling I have seen from an Indian for a long time.”

That 6/21 would remain the best fourth-innings figures by an Indian seamer in history for the next eighteen years. Ishant would finally break it at Lord’s, in July 2014.

Srinath had Venkatesh Prasad alongside him. Accurate, smart, slow. Behind those two, very little. Srinath’s rotator cuff was first operated on in 1997. The cause, by his doctors’ description was overuse. He was the only express bowler India had, and his body broke under the load. One partner, no crew, a shoulder that gave out from carrying the country alone.

Zaheer Khan inherited something Srinath never had. He inherited a team.

Zaheer’s 311 Test wickets are tied with Ishant for the second-most by an Indian pacer behind Kapil. His 2007 reverse-swing tour of England produced 18 wickets in three Tests. India won a series there for the first time in 21 years. It is one of the great performances by an Indian bowler. James Anderson later credited it with shaping his own mastery of the art. In the 2011 World Cup he was the joint top wicket-taker, the spearhead of a side that won India its second world title.

And here is what makes Zak’s era genuinely different. They won abroad. Adelaide 2003. Pakistan 2004. England 2007. Perth 2008. The World Cup at home in 2011. The Test mace in December 2009. By the end of the decade, India was the No. 1 ranked Test side in the world. That had never happened in the Kapil years and certainly not in the Srinath years. The 2000s Indian seam attack was a real attack. Deep enough that India could rotate pacers across long tours without falling apart.

But it was not a fast attack. Irfan Pathan lost his pace by twenty-three. Munaf Patel was 140 on debut and 130 within two seasons. Balaji was 135. RP Singh was a swing bowler. Nehra was 140 when fit, which was rarely. Sreesanth was inconsistent and eventually banned. The Adelaide Test was sealed by Agarkar’s 6/41. The Pakistan series was led, in wickets, by Kumble, Pathan and Balaji. The 2011 World Cup was won, in the end, by Zaheer and a left-arm part time spinner in Yuvraj.

Zak had help. The help was just not built like him. He was the only man who could be relied on to bowl 140 across a five-match series and reverse the old ball when the pitch had gone flat. The attack worked. The attack won abroad. But on any given day, when the new ball stopped doing anything and the pitch went dead, Zak was the only weapon India had.

So the line, traced over thirty-five years, is this.

Kapil bowled alone. Srinath bowled with a partner. Zaheer bowled with a crew. Each generation had more support than the one before. Each generation still had only one genuine fast bowler.

In February 2014, in Wellington, Zaheer took five wickets in his final Test innings. Nobody knew it was his last. But the lineage had quietly reached its end. Behind him, four men were already in the side. None of them, yet, looked like the answer.

III. Four men, four flowers

They were not Bumrah. None of them ever would be. But each of them, in a specific window and a specific format, became something India had never produced before. Not always elite but elite in their place.

Ishant, the meme who took the Honors Board

Ishant never became great at home. India dropped him repeatedly through the 2015-17 home season because Shami and Umesh did the job better on Indian pitches. He was the only one of the four who never reinvented himself for subcontinental conditions.

He was, in the truest sense, an away bowler. His 62 wickets against England by retirement were the second-most by an Indian pacer in history, behind only Kapil. His 7/74 at Lord’s remains the best figures by any Indian bowler in England, ever.

When we say Ishant was elite, we mean elite in a single theatre. England’s grey light. The Dukes ball. A fifth-day pitch and a captain willing to bowl him through three sessions. In that theatre, in that decade, he was as good as any seamer ever played.

What being a meme had cost him as a young man, he never said publicly. What he said instead, after Lord’s, when his captain offered him rest. “There is fuel in the car. Let it run.”

Ishant in away tests is elite.

Bhuvi, the small swing-bowler who learned the death

Bhuvi was the one who looked, on debut, the least like a fast bowler. Barely 135 kph. A short run-up. A quick wrist.

Asked once what set him apart from the other three in the dressing room, Bhuvi gave the most honest answer any member of the quartet ever offered about the others. “We have Shami, Umesh and Ishant, who are better than me when it comes to reverse, when it comes to Indian conditions. But I know if the conditions suit swing bowling, I will be better.”

Between 2013 and 2017, he built one of the most complete white-ball careers an Indian seamer has ever had. However, lets start with Lord’s, 2014. The first signature spell of the quartet era was not Ishant’s. It was Bhuvi’s. 6/82 in England’s first innings. The first Indian seamer in seventy-eight years to take a six-fer at Lord’s. He took Cook, Robson, Bell, Ballance. He finished the series with 19 wickets at 26.63 and the Player of the Series award.

Then he went home and reinvented himself. By 2016 the swing was deserting him at IPL pace. He taught himself the slower ball. The cutter. The yorker at the death. He won the Purple Cap in 2016 (23 wickets) and again in 2017 (26 wickets). The only bowler in IPL history to win it consecutively. In the window from 2014 to 2017, he took 47 death-over wickets in 51 innings at an average of 14.60. Untouchable among 50-plus wicket-takers in the league.

He is the only player in history to take five-wicket hauls in Test, ODI, and T20I cricket for India. Bhuvi was not fast. Bhuvi did not hunt at 145. Bhuvi did something the quartet needed someone to do. He proved an Indian seamer could be world-class without being express, and in the format the rest of the world was about to organise itself around.

Bhuvi in T20s is elite.

Shami, the man for the global stage

Some bowlers announce themselves. Shami arrived already announced. Test debut, Eden Gardens, November 2013. 9 wickets in his first match. A five-for in the second innings. Reverse-swung the old ball at pace on the first day of his career.

But the format that defined Shami was ODI cricket on the biggest stages.

2015 World Cup. Shami took 17 wickets in 8 matches at an average of 17.29. Third in the tournament. Top among Indians. Taking apart Australian and New Zealand top orders.

Here is what almost no one watching that tournament knew. After India’s opening game against Pakistan in Adelaide, Shami’s left knee began to swell. An MRI later revealed that a 4mm bone fragment had snapped clean off. His knee and his thigh were the same size. He could not walk after matches. The doctors gave him two options. Pull out of the World Cup and have surgery now, or play the tournament on painkillers and have surgery after.

He chose to play.

“Someone else could have said no,” he said years later. “I have the ability to bear pain. When you play for the country, you forget everything.”

After every match for the next month, while the team went back to the hotel, Shami went to a hospital. “The doctors used to remove 40-50ml of fluid and pus from my knee, and give me a steroid injection.” In one match he told Dhoni from the field that he could not bowl another over. Dhoni put a hand on his shoulder. “I have faith in you. Even if I bowl to a part-timer, he will go for runs. Just try to give under 60.” After the tournament, he had the surgery. He was unconscious for two hours. When he woke up, he asked the doctor when he could play again. The doctor told him: “It will be a big achievement if you walk without a limp. Forget playing.”

Seventeen World Cup wickets, on Australian pitches, with a knee the doctors had told him would not let him walk afterwards. India went to the semifinal. They lost.

2019 World Cup. Four years later. Bumrah now in the side but still only twenty-five. The selectors picked Bhuvi as the third seamer ahead of Shami. Bhuvi got injured. Shami came in.

Four matches. Fourteen wickets. Average 13.78. Strike rate 15.07.

The best average and strike rate of any bowler in the entire World Cup with ten or more wickets. Better than any teammate, including Bumrah. Better than Starc, Boult, Archer, Rabada. 4/40 against Afghanistan with a hat-trick. Only the second Indian after Chetan Sharma to take a hat-trick in a World Cup. 4/16 against the West Indies. 5/69 against England. His first-ever ODI five-for. Three four-wicket-or-more hauls in three consecutive matches.

Run the two tournaments together. 2015 plus 2019: 31 wickets in 12 matches. By January 2019 he was already the fastest Indian bowler ever to reach 100 ODI wickets. Faster than Zaheer. Faster than Srinath. By the end of 2019 he was the leading wicket-taker in ODI cricket worldwide for the calendar year.

Since Srinath retired in 2003, India had not had a genuine fast strike bowler at a global ICC tournament. Zaheer was a leader of attacks. He was not, except briefly in 2011, a strike bowler. Shami at a World Cup was a strike bowler. The upright seam. The wrist that nipped it both ways. The ability to skid the old ball at 140+ when the pitch had gone dead.

Sunil Gavaskar has compared his run-up to a leopard going for a kill. That sentence does not describe a workhorse, or a partner, or a craftsman. It describes a strike bowler. India had been short of one for over a decade. Shami was the answer. On a fractured knee. With pus drained between matches.

Shami in ODIs is elite.

Umesh, the home enforcer

Umesh Yadav was the son of a coal-mine worker from a village in Vidarbha. He came to leather-ball cricket at nineteen, almost too late by Indian age-group standards. And he became, somehow, the fastest Indian fast bowler since Srinath. Top recorded speed 152.5 kph. The highest any Indian had clocked since 1997.

But here is the line that captures him. In a country whose pitches had, for sixty years, been a punishment for fast bowlers, slow, low, dry, designed for spin, Umesh’s Test average at home was 27.7. His away average was 42. He was the only fast bowler India has ever produced who was demonstrably better on his own dust than on grass and bounce overseas.

Dharamsala. March 2017. The deciding Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. Australia had been 1-0 up after Pune. The series was locked 1-1 going into the final Test. The pitch was unusually firm and bouncy for an Indian wicket. The ball was carrying to the keeper at shoulder height.

In India’s first innings, Pat Cummins peppered Umesh with bouncers during a brief eight-ball cameo at the crease, sending the keeper and the batsman both airborne. Umesh, walking off, told his teammates the plan for Australia’s second innings. “Bowl as many bouncers as possible.”

He took the new ball after lunch. First over, he beat Matt Renshaw’s edge with a length ball. Two balls later, a bouncer that left both batsman and keeper airborne. Next over, David Warner. Pitching within the stumps, slanting away, leaving the left-hander no time to decide which way to move. Warner’s hands punched at the ball as his feet refused to get in line. Edge to Wriddhiman Saha. Then Renshaw. Then the third of the day. Australia, 3 for 31 inside ten overs, before India’s first-innings deficit of 32 had been wiped out.

Michael Clarke, watching from the commentary box, said it plainly. “I don’t think any of the Australian batsmen expected the pace and aggression of Umesh Yadav.”

India won the Test by eight wickets. Umesh finished the series with 17 wickets at 23.41. The biggest haul by an Indian fast bowler in a home Test series this millennium. No Indian pacer had taken 20+ at home since 1979. “This kind of spell comes rarely,” Umesh said afterwards. He spoke quietly. He always did.

Most generations of Indian fans grew up watching foreign pacers come to India and find no help. Umesh was the answer in reverse. He found help where there was supposed to be none. He learned to reverse the old ball on slow pitches the way Srinath had at Ahmedabad in 1996, and he did it at 145, which Srinath, by that age, could not.

India had spent sixty years apologising for its pitches when foreign fast bowlers visited. Umesh was the first who did not need to.

Umesh in home tests is elite.

IV. The handover

Cape Town. January 5, 2018.

India’s Test XI took the field at Newlands without Ishant and without Umesh. They had been dropped to make room for a debutant. The seam attack was Bhuvi, Shami, and a twenty-four-year-old from Gujarat with a strange short-armed action that nobody quite knew how to bat against.

Bhuvi took the new ball. Three overs, three South Africans. Elgar. Markram. Amla. South Africa were 12 for 3. On a different day, it would have been the story of the Test.

Then the debutant came on. AB de Villiers walked down the pitch to try and disrupt him, missed the line, and was caught at slip. Jasprit Bumrah’s first Test wicket was AB de Villiers.

Across the three-match series, Bumrah was the second-highest wicket-taker for India behind Shami.

Bumrah did not arrive into a vacuum. Bumrah arrived into a setup built by four men who were still in it.

V. Bumrah is the quartet

Here is the part that gets lost in the Bumrah era.

The quartet held four elite domains, each in a different body. Ishant in away tests. Bhuvi in T20s. Shami in ODIs and World Cups. Umesh at home tests. Four men. Four niches. One combined portfolio of everything Indian fast bowling had historically been deficient in.

Bumrah, in his first five years, became all four of them at once.

In England in 2021, he was the lead pacer of the away tour the way Ishant had been at Lord’s. In the 2022 T20 World Cup and across IPL seasons since, he has bowled the death overs better than Bhuvi did at his peak. In the 2019 World Cup he was already a strike bowler at a global tournament the way Shami was forced to be on a fractured knee in 2015. At home, on slow pitches against South Africa and New Zealand, he reverses the old ball at 145 the way Umesh did at Dharamsala. He is the first Indian fast bowler in history who is elite in every format, every condition, every phase of a match.

That is not a coincidence. It is the structural luck of his career.

Every generation of greatness needs someone to outdo. Bradman had Hammond. Tendulkar had Gavaskar. Kapil Dev had, for most of his career, only himself, which is why Kapil’s greatness is admired but never quite measurable. There was no one in his own dressing room he had to surpass.

Bumrah had it the other way around. He had four people to surpass. Four niches in which to do it. Four standards already set by men sitting next to him in the same dressing room. Other Indian fast bowlers were born too early, into eras when there was no one elite alongside them and no one elite ahead of them. Bumrah was born exactly late enough to inherit a benchmark that was already high in every dimension.

He surpassed all four of them. That is not a complaint. That is the point. You can only become the greatest of your country if your country has had great fast bowlers in the format you are about to dominate, in the conditions you are about to master, in the moments you are about to define. Bumrah’s greatness is partly his. The action, the wrist, the angle, the unteachable bit. But it is also partly theirs. The quartet held the bar high enough that he had something to clear.

The quartet was Bumrah, distributed across four bodies. Bumrah is the quartet, condensed into one.

---

VI. What comes next

More fast bowlers will come. They are already here. Siraj. Prasidh Krishna. Akash Deep. Arshdeep Singh. Mukesh Kumar. Mayank Yadav. Names that, twenty years ago, would have been ranked overseas-tour-only swing bowlers. Names that now arrive into the Test side already expected to bowl 145+.

All of them, from now on, will be compared to Bumrah. The same way Bumrah was compared, briefly, to the four men in the dressing room when he debuted. The same way the quartet was compared to Zaheer. The same way Zaheer was compared to Srinath. The same way Srinath was compared to Kapil.

This is how Indian fast bowling has always worked. Each generation measures itself against the one before it. The bar rises every time.

VII. The flowers

Here is the cost of being the generation before a genius.

Bumrah is so good that the quartet has been quietly erased. We do not remember Bhuvi’s two consecutive Purple Caps the way we should, because Bumrah’s death bowling is greater. We do not remember Shami’s 17 wickets on a fractured knee in 2015, because Bumrah’s 2024 T20 World Cup is more recent and more complete. We do not remember Ishant’s 7/74 at Lord’s the way England’s pacers remember it, because the spell that won that Test happened ten years and one Bumrah ago. We do not remember Umesh’s spell at Dharamsala, because nobody remembers spells by Indian seamers on Indian soil. We do not remember any of them, really. We remember the man they made possible.

This piece is the small correction.

Indian fast bowling spent forty years pretending. It pretended that Mohammad Nissar in the 1930s had been a fluke. It pretended that Kapil in the 1980s would be enough on his own. It pretended that Srinath would last forever. It pretended, for the decade Zaheer led the attack, that swing and seam at 135 was the Indian way and that pace was for other countries.

From 2013 four men stopped pretending and took Indian fast bowling to elite status.

Ishant: Elite away seamer. Bhuvi: Elite and complete T20 bowler. Shami: elite strike bowler in ODIs and World Cups. Umesh: Elite at home.

Each is a thing India had been waiting for. Each had taken either decades to arrive. They all arrived, in the same dressing room, between 2013 and 2017. Not one of them was elite everywhere. All of them, between them, were elite somewhere.

Bhuvi. Ishant. Shami. Umesh.

Four bowlers. Four barriers. One generation.

They were not the gift. They were the wrapping. The gift came in January 2018, walked onto the field at Newlands, took the wicket of AB de Villiers in his fifth over, and would go on to become the greatest fast bowler this country has ever produced. Because he was, all by himself, what those four men had been together.

That is how a country becomes a fast-bowling country.

---

Career figures from ESPNcricinfo Statsguru; Quotes attributed inline.

---